Better information makes for healthier horses,
Horseadvice.com is where equine science and horse sense intersect.

Discussion on Fecal exam results

Use the navigation bar above to access articles and more discussions on this topic.
Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Angela S
Member
Username: vera

Post Number: 59
Registered: 6-2008
Posted on Wednesday, Mar 11, 2009 - 9:19 am:   Edit PostPrint Post

I took advantage of the free fecal exam program by intervet and just got the results back. horse #1 is ++ (11-50) for roundworms, horse #2 is + (1-11) for both roundworms and strongyles, and horse # 3 is + for strongyles and ++ for roundworms. Both ++'s that I have are on the low end of the scale. Still I'm very worried. I did this right before giving them pyrantal pamoate at the beginning of March. What should I do?????
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Angela S
Member
Username: vera

Post Number: 60
Registered: 6-2008
Posted on Wednesday, Mar 11, 2009 - 2:19 pm:   Edit PostPrint Post

The total eggs counts were given as well. Horse #1 had a total egg count of 13. I'm supposed to multiply by 150 and that gives me eggs per pound, so horse #1 has 1950 eggs/pound manure and horse number #2 has 1050 eggs/lb manure, and horse #3 has 2400 eggs/pound. All I've seen on the internet as far as interpreting these results is in eggs per gram so in that case they all have single digit numbers if I divide by 454. I'm quite confused.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert N. Oglesby DVM
Moderator
Username: dro

Post Number: 22531
Registered: 1-1997
Posted on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 - 8:49 am:   Edit PostPrint Post

Angela, since I do not know the procedure used I cannot really comment on their values and evaluations. But your math is correct and if the technique used comparable to a McMasters technique your values (eggs per lb/454 gm per lb) indicate a very low level of parasitism.

Have you seen our recently updated deworming program? There are good reasons why we would recommend a avermectin type dewormer at this time of the year instead of pyrantel. More about this in both the Overview and Schedule articles.
DrO
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Angela S
Member
Username: vera

Post Number: 61
Registered: 6-2008
Posted on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 - 12:10 pm:   Edit PostPrint Post

Results
All labs use the “Modified Wisconsin Sugar Floatation Technique” for conducting fecal worm egg counts. The results are reported as the incidence of eggs from a specific genera, coccidia or tapeworm: 0-10 eggs =+, 11-50 eggs =++, over 50 eggs =+++. The total number of eggs of all genera (except tapeworms and coccidia) is given in Total Count column. Number of eggs reported X 150 = Eggs per Pound of Manure (the standard measure of parasite contamination level).

Above is copied from the paperwork for the fecal exam. Yeah, I think I'm a little messed up with my rotation schedule. I was planning on giving Equimax next. How soon can I give that? I'd like to get on a better routine.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert N. Oglesby DVM
Moderator
Username: dro

Post Number: 22535
Registered: 1-1997
Posted on Friday, Mar 13, 2009 - 8:13 am:   Edit PostPrint Post

Modified Wisconsin Sugar Flotation Technique I will have to look up. And I don't think I have ever seen eggs per lb reported, I always see eggs per gm. If the results of this test are comparable there evaluations are very strict as their +++ translates to as little as 2 eggs per gram a common level found in healthy horses.

Little work has been done on what is considered a safe level of parasite burden and recommendations are based largely on levels detected in otherwise healthy horses. Yes we all know there are lots of health problems with high parasite burdens but things get a bit hazy between high and no parasites. In general the lower the better but this eventually bumps into overexposure of our anthelmintics and resistance development. This is an ongoing issue with no absolute solution yet.
DrO
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Marilyn
Member
Username: mari1yn

Post Number: 10
Registered: 2-2006
Posted on Thursday, Oct 22, 2009 - 3:13 pm:   Edit PostPrint Post

My vet is concerned dewormers are becoming ineffective. That worms are becoming resistant to dewormers. They recommend doing fecal testing and deworm only based on results of fecal testing. Does this work?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert N. Oglesby DVM
Moderator
Username: dro

Post Number: 23973
Registered: 1-1997
Posted on Friday, Oct 23, 2009 - 7:05 am:   Edit PostPrint Post

Hello Marilyn,
With the recent finding that ascarids are becoming resistant to the avermectins we are being warned no dewormer is forever. We cover your question in depth in our "Overview" and "Schedule" articles at Horse Care » Worms, Deworming, Parasite Control.
DrO
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Marilyn
Member
Username: mari1yn

Post Number: 11
Registered: 2-2006
Posted on Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 - 12:19 pm:   Edit PostPrint Post

Thanks Dr. O. Am changing vets after move to CA. The current DVM I am considering wants to use dewormer only for parasite(s) found in fecal sample which she would check each month. She says this is the new thinking among veterinarians. Just seeking clarification. Thanks again for your valued opinion. Marilyn
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert N. Oglesby DVM
Moderator
Username: dro

Post Number: 23981
Registered: 1-1997
Posted on Sunday, Oct 25, 2009 - 9:49 am:   Edit PostPrint Post

Good worming regimens will typically have prepatent periods longer than 30 days which means once administered it takes longer than 30 days before egg productions starts back up almost no matter how wormy the horse is. I would think basing deworming programs on quarterly or even twice yearly results would be sufficient in the vast majority of cases. The bigger the problem the more frequently it should be done.
DrO
Post a Message to this Discussion
Posting
Instructions:
Full Service Members may post to this discussion and should address the orignial poster's concerns or other information posted here. New questions about your horse should be started in a new discussion. Use the navigation bar at the top of this page to return to the parent article and review the article and existing discussions. If your question remains unanswered "Start a New Discussion", the link is under the list of discussions at the bottom of the article.
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username:
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:
Home Page | Todays Discussions | Search | Top of Page Administration
  http://www.horseadvice.com
is The Horseman's Advisor
Helping Thousands of Equestrians, Farriers, and Veterinarians Every Day
All rights reserved, © 2009
BBB Reliability Seal